scifirenegade: (Default)
A few months ago (it has been that long o_O ), I wrote a summary of a play's summary. TLDR: if the abridged version of A Woman's Face is any indicative of its original's quality, then the films just made everything better (I assume the Molander/Bergman version is good).

However! There's a French film from 1933 that seems to be a closer adaptation, but French films that aren't the crème de la crème in the eyes of a cinephile are hard to find (see: French FP1, I want to see Charles Boyer doing that weirdo Ellissen).

Plot twist, it was on [insert Russian website here]. I'll have to give it a watch sometime. For now, look at the web of adaptations.



Oof.

EDIT: the novelisation is actually Finnish *facepalm*
scifirenegade: (:) | hardt)




Cinemateca has a more complete retrospective on George Cukor, in book format (will see if I can snag a copy for myself).

While Manuel Cintra Ferreira's text is better than the other one I posted, the "author" has a lot of "quirks" (you'll see) and I heavily disagree with some of his opinions, specifically when it comes to the screenplay being seemingly outdated and to Segert. I could write why I disagree, but eh, feel like it deserves its own post. And I still have to write the fabled Erik meta. The style talk is great, though. I would emphasise the chiaroscuro more.

This is looong )

Shame there's no Above Suspicion pic here lol.

Sorry about the rotationnon the second scan. This is what happens when you clear the EXIF data.

On another note: someone I follow on Tumblr, who has never shown interest in Conrad Veidt, reblogged a very amusing post comparing a cat with a moustache-like marking on the face with Torsten :D

And Ebbing too. I think he got there by accident. But who am I to deny his tunnel of love :D
scifirenegade: (blep | marquis)
Couple of months ago, got the hold of a catalogue of a retrospective of George Cukor that Cinemateca Portuguesa did in 1996. All of Cukor's filmography was shown in that retrospective, but only a select few films have texts here.



Behold! (nice kitchen towel and hand)

So, I go straight to the A Woman's Face entry and... it's fine. I think they didn't get Anna's character.




Translation below, if you're interested.

If Cukor suggested Joan Crawford for Susan and God, it was Crawford who wanted Cukor in A Woman's Face. The actress was convinced that, in this difficult phase of her career, only a big dramatic triumph could shed light to her ambitions. As one knows, this dream had to wait until 1945, with Mildred Pierce. And the filmmaker who "turned her career around" wouldn't be Cukor, but Michael Curtiz (but Crawford was loyal and declared that the Oscar she won for Curtiz's film was truly because of A Woman's Face). It's curious to note, however, that it's Cukor who takes a new turn in Crawford's career, just as he's directing Garbo and Norma Shearer's latest films.

A Woman's Face is a film that, simbolically, has something to tell us about the two personalities that participate in it, Cukor and Crawford: the first, the ethical value of beauty, that is, beauty as a criteria for moral measurement. It's curious Cukor directed this film, a man so profoundly concious about his uglyness, who searched relentlessly for beauty in others. Anna, in the film, was bad because she was ugly, it's in the horrible scar that disgures her that lives the origin and the cause of her evil. After the surgery, the face that appears can only be good. Cukor said, a bit ironically, that, in the first half of A Woman's Face, there was the work of an actress giving it her all: in his half, however, there was only Joan Crawford's face. In Crawford's part we have, let's say, the opposite situation: tired of being "pretty" in numerous MGM productions in which she did little more than showcasimg Adrian's models from one side of the screen to the other, she wanted now to prove that it wasn't only her face that mattered, but her acting talent. A Woman's Face appears at a time in which Crawford wants to destroy her own image (and note the film was done against Mayer, who believed it to be unthinkable to make Crawford "ugly") that would culminate in Nicholas Ray's Johnny Guitar (1954). Moreover, the intense suffering and to fill a film eith this suffering would be Crawford's hallmark from now on. The love affair with the camera still persists (perhaps to a lesser degree), but the way of sweeping the public away was different.


But wait!



Above Suspicion is my favourite Cukor film, indeed...
scifirenegade: (thonk | ian)
A Woman's Face (1941) is so damn near close to perfection, but I got curious about the OG play: Il Était Une Fois, by Francis de Croisset. Of course, the film is a remake of En Kvinnas Ansikte (1938, the Gustaf Molander film with Ingrid Bergman), which has barely anything to do with its pretty obscure play, but hey-ho.

There's a problem: I can't find the OG play. Searched everywhere, no luck. What I found was a truncated Spanish version (really, they even tell the director not to cut bits from the play because there are a lot of cut bits already). I also don't know Spanish, but eh, it's badly spoken Portuguese anyway, it should be fine (I'm joking, I'm joking).

It got really long, and I had to put it under this cut )

This truncated version of the play lacks bite. Everyone is one-dimensional. I think the films are an improvement (I haven't seen Molander's film yet, but I bet it's much better than the OG play).

Yet, I feel bad for concluding the post like this. It's, yet again, a play with a lot of chunks missing. But until de Croisset's full play someone finds its way on-the-line, it's what we got.
Page generated 24 May 2025 05:50
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »